‘No Valid Reason’ to Withhold More Than 14,000 Hours of Jan. 6 Video: Defense Attorney

Government doesn’t desire the public ‘to see that the large bulk of what went on was really tranquil,’ Jonathon Moseley composed

The defense lawyer for a member of the Oath Keepers charged with seditious conspiracy stemming from the U.S. Capitol discontent on Jan. 6, 2021, hasactually submitted a movement to stepin in a claim that looksfor to force the U.S. Capitol Police to release more than 14,000 hours of video from monitoring videocameras, wise phones and cops body-worn electroniccameras.

Jonathon Moseley, who represents Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs of Dunnellon, Florida, looksfor to stepin in Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Capitol Police, a 2021 suit that intends to unmask most of the Jan. 6 video videofootage now concealed from the public by court seal.

“Having seen the files and records under the court’s protective order, Jonathon Moseley can affirm and verify, and thus does so, that there is no legitimate factor for the files and records to be kept from the public,” Moseley composed in a Feb. 11 movement in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Epoch Times Photo
Ashli Babbitt pleads with authorities to call for backup at the Speaker’s Lobby doors on Jan. 6,2021 Overhead CCTV video video now under court seal might response numerous concerns about her shooting death. (Video Still / ©Tayler Hansen)

U.S. District Judge Florence Y. Pan rejected Moseley’s movement to stepin, judgment he did not make adequate effort to figureout how Judicial Watch and U.S. Capitol Police seen his movement.

“The movants do not have a conditional best to stepin under a federal statute, nor do they state a claim or defense that shares with the primary action a typical concern of law or reality,” Pan composed.

The U.S. Congress is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. The U.S. Capitol Police, as a subsidiary of Congress, isn’t bound by the 1966 law that normally needs the federal federalgovernment to reveal records and other info to the public upon demand.

Judicial Watch tooklegalactionagainst Capitol Police in January 2021 under the common-law right of gainaccessto, a legal concept that the public has a right to gainaccessto public records and files.

Judicial Watch tooklegalactionagainst for the release of all video tape-recorded inbetween twelvenoon and 9 p.m. on Jan. 6, 2021, and for e-mails inbetween the U.S. Capitol Police executive group and the authorities board, as well as e-mails inbetween cops and the FBI, U.S. Department of Justice, and the Department of Homeland Security.

Capitol Police submitted a movement declaring it isn’t bound to release records due to sovereign resistance, a legal teaching that guards federalgovernments from being takenlegalactionagainst for civil wrongs.

Despite the Capitol Police’s specified issues that launching the chest of video would expose security indicates and approaches, Moseley stated he sees a various factor for the secrecy.

“They wear’t desire the public to see that the large bulk of what went on was really serene,” Moseley informed The Epoch Times. “There were the violent videos they’ve revealed, are all in simply one place, or in a yard. You understand, they keep revealing over and over onceagain this fight in the archway—that’s simply one entryway out of a structure that’s 700 feet long. So I believe it would waterdown their narrative to program whatever.”

Moseley stated that on a current trip of the Capitol setup by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, Capitol Police prohibited the defense lawyers and privateinvestigators from photographing particular locations, consistingof things that are noticeable from the street. They likewise restricted photos of the galleries in the House of Representatives.

Epoch Times Photo
A protester appears to be listening to guidelines soon previously he shutsdown the lock on the inner Columbus Doors at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6,2021 Defendants charged with breaching the doors argue this CCTV video reveals the doors were opened from the within. (Video Still/U.S. Department of Justice)

“They designated that as non public—we couldn’t take pictures of the galleries,” Moseley stated. “I’m like, ‘What the heck?’ These will be noticeable throughout the State of the Union to anyone around the world.

“So that’s one of the huge things, their claim that this would compromise the Capitol’s security to program these things.” Moseley stated. “It’s one of the things that I desired to knock down and state, ‘You can’t conceal behind that as an reason.’”

Moseley revealed disappointment that the federalgovernment’s selective release of video clips and the almost continuous condemnations of Jan. 6 accuseds by some jurists and members of Congress haveactually polluted the jury swimmingpool for the trials setup to start in the coming weeks and months. He stated he will lookfor a modification of place for the Meggs case.

“There’s been continuously condemnation of these offenders by the lawyer basic, by other judges as they’ve been sentencing individuals,” Moseley stated. “They’ve made remarks that go far beyond the specific that they’re talking about, made generalized condemnations of all the accuseds, most of whom sanctuary’t gone to trial .

“There’s likewise the issue that the capability to choice and pick what’s launched avoids a check and balance on the federalgovernment and the Congress,” Moseley stated. “If they understood whatever was public, they may be a little more cautious with what they state.”

The jury swimmingpool in the District of Columbia hasactually been “incurably affected,” Moseley composed in his movement to stepin in the Judicial Watch case.

“Kelly Meggs as a criminal accused is being personally prejudiced by the one-sided tsunami of incorrect however prejudicial info,” Moseley composed, “while the federalgovernment—including the U.S. Capitol Police—pick and select what details with which to smear these accuseds in public and condemn them in public, while withholding an equivalent step of exculpatory info.”

In a filing in the Judicial Watch case, Thomas DiBiase, basic counsel for U.S. Capitol Police, stated the release of video video might supply important security info to individuals who may lookfor to attack the Capitol onceagain.

Video can likewise be thoughtabout security details that is “sensitive with regard to the policing, defense, physical security, intelligence, counter-terrorism actions or emergencysituation readiness.” Of the more than 14,000 hours of video, just about 17 hours to date was designated “security details,” DiBiase stated.

Joseph M. Hanneman

Follow

Joseph Hanneman is a pressreporter for The Epoch Times who covers the State of Wisconsin. His work over a almost 40-year profession has appeared in Catholic World Report, the Racine Journal Times, the Wisconsin State Journal and the Chicago Tribune. Reach him at: [email protected]

Source: ‘No Valid Reason’ to Withhold More Than 14,000 Hours of Jan. 6 Video: Defense Attorney.

‘No Valid Reason’ to Withhold More Than 14,000 Hours of Jan. 6 Video: Defense Attorney - Click To Share

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Other recent press releases

*This is a free press release. All upgraded press releases are ad-free!

LIVE on May 17, 9 AM ET: First UFO Hearing in Congress

The House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Subcommittee will hold an open hearing on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena on May 17. Following the open portion of the hearing, the subcommittee will hold a closed, classified briefing. Who Honorable Ronald S. Moultrie, Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Scott W. Bray, Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence…

Infertile men may be twice as likely to develop breast cancer, study suggests

Infertile men may be twice as likely to develop breast cancer than those without fertility issues, according to one of the largest ever studies of the disease.Breast cancer in males is less common than in females and its relation to infertility had previously been investigated only in small studies. The new research was published in…